Journal of Vacation Marketing

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fredline, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Vacation Marketing, Vol. 5, No. 2, 125-139 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/135676679900500202

Destination competitiveness: An exploratory examination of South Australia’s core attractions

Bill Faulkner

Centre for Tourism and Hotel Management Research

Martin Oppermann

School of Tourism and Hotel Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Elizabeth Fredline

Competitive analysis of destinations is rapidly gaining in importance in the strategic positioning and marketing planning of destinations. Thus far, relatively few tourism studies have utilised competitiveness as an assessment tool. This paper uses a qualitative approach toward evaluating South Australia’s competitiveness in the Australian domestic tourism context. Based on interviews with travel agents, who are traditionally information gatekeepers and a crucial component of the distribution channel, this paper reveals that South Australia is only in a strong position with respect to two out of eight core attractions emphasised in that state’s tourism promotion material. Apart from the wine industry and the ‘big river’ theme associated with the Murray River, none of the state’s other tourism features is recognised within the market.

Key Words: South Australia • competitiveness • destination attractiveness • tourism icons


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
M. J. Enright and J. Newton
Determinants of Tourism Destination Competitiveness in Asia Pacific: Comprehensiveness and Universality
Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2005; 43(4): 339 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Of Vacation MarketingHome page
B. Prideaux and C. Cooper
Marketing and destination growth: A symbiotic relationship or simple coincidence?
Journal of Vacation Marketing, January 1, 2003; 9(1): 35 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Of Vacation MarketingHome page
A. Yuksel and F. Yuksel
Comparative performance analysis: Tourists' perceptions of Turkey relative to other tourist destinations
Journal of Vacation Marketing, October 1, 2001; 7(4): 333 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]